Antisemitism: Bad for Whites

 I’ve figured out why so many antisemites’ arguments consist entirely of “Kevin MacDonald said so” and why they throw tantrums when you point out that MacDonald got a lot of simple facts wrong, ignored important historical events that didn’t suit his claims, and even changed his mind constantly throughout his books (at least the two that I have read) about exactly what those claims were.

This weekend, I was having a civilized debate with a liberal friend of mine. I cited some facts to support my point and linked to an article to verify the facts. She pointed out that the article was on a conservative news site, so how did she know it was trustworthy? Of course, conservative news sites are the only ones that are at all trustworthy, but rather than try to convince her of this, I spent a few minutes digging up articles on “mainstream” (i.e. liberal) sites with the same facts in them. With the facts established, we were able to get on with debating our interpretations of them.

But if you tell a Kevin MacDonald groupie that “Kevin MacDonald said so” is not good enough for you, they have nowhere else to go. Sure, they can find evidence in any history book that for the past century and a half, Jews have joined corrupt Gentiles in promoting progressivism, a belief system invented by Gentiles while my ancestors were shut up in shtetls, and that progressivism and all its elements – socialism, the insistence that all races are equal, etc. – is clearly bad for humanity. This is, unfortunately, true. But if you want to contend that progressivism is all our fault, or that we’ve been plotting to dominate Gentiles for hundreds or thousands of years, the evidence just isn’t there. Any history book will yield facts that support the contention that black people are not intelligent enough to invent things or create a civilization; the debate between race realists and egalitarians is over the interpretation of those facts. Finding evidence of harmful Jewish behavior from before the publication of The Communist Manifesto (which was a rip-off of works by two Gentiles, Thomas More and Plato) is very difficult. Finding evidence that now we are trying to take over the world or ruin Gentiles also requires selectively interpreting the facts. Kevin MacDonald has to use numerous factual errors and ignore major historical events to support his claims. History books by anyone else, whether they like Jews or not, are not going to contain the same factual errors or ignore the historical events that go against his theories.

So when you point out that Kevin MacDonald is not a trustworthy source, which he isn’t, his groupies have nowhere else to go. His books, and perhaps a few written by his groupies, are literally the only ones which will support his worldview.

Over at Counter-Currents there are at least two articles claiming that St. Paul repackaged Christianity and marketed it to Gentiles to achieve Jewish domination with the Christian ideals of universalism and equality of all humans. None of the gaping holes in this thesis are so much as mentioned. The claim that St. Paul’s goal in life was to dominate Gentiles is not supported except by mentioning that he was a Jew. So of course all he wanted was to dominate Gentiles! That’s what all Jews want, everybody knows that! Haven’t you read Kevin MacDonald? That Christianity was not interpreted to mean that everyone was equal until the Gentile enterprise known as the Enlightenment, a movement which made Christianity weaker than it has been since the time of Constantine, is not explained. Christians spent the better part of the next two millenia depriving Jews of citizenship, expelling us from one country after another, confining us to ghettoes and shtetls and pales, sending the Inquisition to torture us into converting, and conducting the occasional pogrom. This means that if Christianity was indeed an attempt to dominate Gentiles, it was a laughable failure. This is not explained by the articles I mentioned. The only rebuttal I can think of that my enemies might make is that it was only when Europe became more secular and the Nazis led a bit of a pagan revival that the Holocaust happened, and that would require the antisemite making the argument to admit that the Holocaust happened.

That my people have behaved badly since the early 20th century (before that it was only a microscopic handful, i.e. Karl Marx, who were behaving in an antisocial manner) is true. Believe me, I wish it weren’t, but it is.

But saving the White race depends on Whites who acknowledge this without entertaining flimsy theories about the Jews being the sole cause of all bad things. The committed antisemites – that is, the ones who believe we are innately bad no matter what – can’t do it, for a few reasons. One is that they can’t be bothered to gather facts before accepting loony theories, like the Counter-Currents authors mentioned above. Another is, like them and MacDonald, that they are not very logical. Even if they were right about us, when they apply that kind of logic to other things, they will inevitably bring about disaster to Gentiles, never mind us. And finally, they can’t take responsibility. I have, several times in this blog, admitted and deplored the fact that many of my people have behaved in a harmful way in the past century and a half. The antisemites refuse to accept that White Gentiles have done most of this stuff to themselves, or that much of what they deplore is contained in human nature – the nature of all humans. For instance, some of these people believe that a “command economy” will actually work as long as there are no Jews around to muck it up. That every command economy in history has been an abysmal failure, because it goes completely against innate human urges to competition and acquisitiveness, they ignore. The corruption of the modern West is simply the same inevitable decline of every civilization, but this, too, they refuse to admit; nothing would ever decline if Jews didn’t make it decline, according to them. Progressive ideas are also the unavoidable ego-saving mechanism of humans who know themselves to be corrupt and inferior, not a plot from us:


And this answer is that, in the last analysis, civilization always depends upon the qualities of the people who are the bearers of it. All these vast accumulations of instruments and ideas, massed and welded into marvelous structures rising harmoniously in glittering majesty, rest upon living foundations — upon the men and women who create and sustain them. So long as those men and women are able to support it, the structure rises, broad-based and serene; but let the living foundations prove unequal to the task, and the mightiest civilization sags, cracks, and at last crashes down into chaotic ruin.
Civilization thus depends absolutely upon the quality of its human supporters.

This fact is that, while hereditary qualities are implanted in the individual with no action on his part, social acquirements are taken over only at the cost of distinct effort. How great this effort may become is easily seen by the long years of strenuous mental labor required in modern youth to assimilate the knowledge already gained by adults. That old saying, “There is no royal road to learning,” illustrates the hard fact that each successive generation must tread the same thorny path if the acquirements of the past are to be retained. Of course, it is obvious that the more acquirements increase, the longer and steeper the path must be. And this raises the query: May there not come a point where the youthful traveller will be unable to scale the height — where the effort required will be beyond his powers?
Well, this is precisely what has happened numberless times in the past. It is happening to multitudes of individuals about us every day.

Now, among our human categories we have observed that progress is primarily due to the superiors. It is they who found and further civilizations. As for the intermediate mass, it accepts the achievements of its creative pioneers. Its attitude is receptive. This receptivity is due to the fact that most of the intermediate grades are near enough to the superiors to understand and assimilate what the superiors have initiated.
But what about the inferiors? Hitherto we have not analyzed their attitude. We have seen that they are incapable of either creating of furthering civilization, and are thus a negative hindrance to progress. But the inferiors are not mere negative factors in civilized life; they are also positive — in an inverse, destructive sense. The inferior elements are, instinctively or consciously, the enemies of civilization. And they are its enemies, not by chance, but because they are more or less uncivilizable.

The word inferior has, however, been so often employed as a synonym for degenerate that it tends to produce confusion of thought, and to avoid this I have coined a term which seems to describe collectively all those kinds of persons whom I have just discussed. This term is The Under-Man – the man who measures under the standards of capacity and adaptability imposed by the social order in which he lives. And this term I shall henceforth employ.

Now how does the Under-Man look at civilization? This civilization offers him few benefits and fewer hopes. It usually affords him little beyond a meagre subsistence. And, sooner or later, he instinctively senses that he is a failure; that civilization’s prizes are not for him. But this civilization, which withholds benefits, does not hesitate to impose burdens. We have previously stated that civilization’s heaviest burdens are borne by the superior. Absolutely, this is true; relatively the Under-Man’s intrinsically lighter burdens feel heavier because of his innate incapacity. The very discipline of the social order oppresses the Under-Man; it thwarts and chastises him at every turn. To wild natures society is a torment, while the congenital caveman, placed in civilization, is always in trouble and usually in jail.

Such is the Under-Man’s unhappy lot. Now, what is his attitude toward that civilization from which he has so little to hope? What but instinctive opposition and discontent? These feelings, of course, vary all the way from dull, unreasoning dislike to flaming hatred and rebellion. But, in the last analysis, they are directed not merely against imperfections in the social order, but against the social order itself. This is a point which is rarely mentioned, and still more rarely understood. Yet it is the meat of the whole matter. We must realize clearly that the basic attitude of the Under-Man is an instinctive and natural revolt against civilization. The reform of abuses may diminish the intensity of social discontent.

Lastly, there is the “misguided superior.” He is a strange phenomenon! Placed by nature in the van of civilization, he goes over to its enemies. This seems inexplicable. Yet it can be explained. As the Under-Man revolts because civilization is so far ahead of him, so the misguided superior revolts because it is so far behind. Exasperated by its slow progress, shocked at its faults, and erroneously ascribing to mankind in general his own lofty impulses, the misguided superior dreams short cuts to the millennium and joins the forces of social revolt, not realizing that their ends are profoundly different even though their methods may be somewhat the same. The misguided superior is probably the most pathetic figure in human history. Flattered by designing scoundrels, used to sanctify sinister schemes, and pushed forward as a figurehead during the early stages of revolutionary agitation, the triumph of the revolution brings him to a tragic end. Horrified at sight of barbarism’s unmasked face, he tries to stay its destructive course. In vain! The Under-Man turns upon his former champion with a snarl and tramples him into the mud.

Source: The Revolt Against Civilization by Lothrop Stoddard


If the White race is to have a future, it is up to White Jews and Whites who can accept that Jews are not the source of all bad things to secure it. Those who blame us for everything cannot do it.

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

Again, thank you, and a couple of links.

The support in your comments is greatly, greatly appreciated.

On another note, a couple of the KM groupies have, as I suggested, come up with criticisms of Jews which don’t rely on citing an author who not only pretends not to know that gentiles developed most of today’s destructive ideals during the Enlightenment with no help at all from Jews, but also thinks the Enlightenment started half a century (or more, depending on your source) after it did. Those comments are approved, if anyone cares to read them – they’re on the last few posts.

So yes, I will keep on, and I’ll try to post at least a couple of times a week. Thank you all.

Here’s a couple of links I stumbled across this morning.

Is it still wrong if another culture says it is right? A teacher’s surprising discovery

A teacher discovers the downside of multiculturalism. Like having Canadian college students unable to condemn a Muslim cutting off his wife’s nose and ears.

Indiana 2008 Presidential Primary Election Fraud Probe Heats Up

The prospect that theirs are two of an estimated 150 signatures that may have been forged on the petitions has raised the question of whether President Obama actually reached the legitimate number of signatures needed to be placed on the ballot in Indiana. Under state law, presidential candidates need to file 500 signatures from each of the state’s nine congressional districts. Indiana election officials say that in St. Joseph County, the Obama campaign qualified with 534 signatures; Clinton’s camp had 704. The certified signatures were never challenged.

Posted in Islam, Obama | 1 Comment

Thank you!

For the many supportive comments my new readers made. I fully expected that when I had a chance to log in today, there would be nothing but 10,000 more antisemitic attacks, but instead I found a lot of encouragement. I can’t thank you all enough.

Especially since I wasn’t only troubled on my own account, but also on that of the entire White race – gentiles and Ashkenazi alike. Because if a majority of Whites have drunk the liberal anti-White Kool-Aid, and most of the rest are dumb enough to think Kevin MacDonald should be taken seriously, well, we might as well just crack a beer and tune in to American Idol for the rest of our lives, because our race would have no hope.

I’m going to post just a small handful of the many sites I know of debunking MacDonald’s sloppy scholarship, but really, I shouldn’t have to. The burden is on him to explain why he couldn’t look up basic facts – indisputable things like dates and places, not stuff that’s at all open to interpretation – before publishing, so that anyone with the most basic knowledge of history can easily catch errors in his work. And didn’t any of his groupies feel some confusion when he kept alternating between declaring that individualism was an evil Jewish plot to undermine gentile solidarity, and other times declaring that individualism was a noble gentile trait that we tribal Jews just couldn’t get?

Posting the links here, and after this I’m not going to bother to talk about that idiot anymore. And I’ll automatically delete any comment that relies on citing him as a source, because citing him amounts to admitting that 1) you have no actual facts at your disposal, and 2) you are a moron.

Incidentally, you’ll find that many of the links below include a lot of criticism of Jews. Much of it, unfortunately, valid. See, it is possible to criticize Jews without relying on the contradictory and factually incorrect arguments of MacDonald! Seriously, antisemites, you can do better. You don’t have to embarrass yourselves by propping him up.

Really, a much better case could be made that everything bad is the fault of the Irish or the Freemasons.

Professor of Anti-Semitism

Scholarship as an Exercise in Rhetorical Strategy: A Case Study of Kevin MacDonald’s Research Techniques

Critique of the Culture of Kevin MacDonald

MacDonald’s anti-Semitism

Answering Anti-Semites

The Marx of the Anti-Semites by John Derbyshire

Posted in Jews, Kevin MacDonald | 12 Comments

Yeah, as soon as I get some readers, I’m already fed up.

I’m probably not going to continue with this blog. It’s pretty clear that Jews are not welcome in race realism, I suppose because if other whites accepted us, they wouldn’t be able to blame us for their own mistakes anymore.

Some – SOME – of the criticisms and outright attacks on Jews on sites like Counter-Currents have SOME merit to them. I hate to admit it, but it’s true. But most of them are as stupid as the ones in Cambria Will Not Yield, or the comments I refused to approve here. I just got a comment (unapproved) on the post where I stated that I read Kevin McDonald’s books to find out what the fuss was and discovered that they shouldn’t have been able to con a 12-year-old; the comment asked if I had read Kevin McDonald. Another contested my (correct) assertion that Jews rarely commit violent crimes by citing a total of ONE Jew who committed a violent crime!

Someone else complained that I hadn’t posted his lies, which he described as “criticism”. I’ll approve comments with criticism, but not lies. By “not lies” I mean “facts that are verified by sources more reliable than Kevin McDonald”. The bar could not possibly be set lower without ceasing to exist.

Someone else complained vaguely, apparently that I am too pessimistic. He didn’t explain just what he was getting at, but if he wants cheery optimism, what is he doing in the race realist blogosphere?

I dunno; maybe if I read enough of this tripe, I’m supposed to conclude that even though I have never met even one Jew who even remotely resembles the creature such ravings describe, that their ravings are the reality and what I actually encounter in real life is inconsequential. In other words, exactly the same kind of thing that antiwhite white liberals want us to believe about blacks, Muslims and Latinos: “Who are you going to believe, us or your lying eyes?”

It isn’t as if I’ve just discovered that blog comments get a lot of hostility and stupidity. I actually used to keep a more general political blog (no longer online) that got a LOT of attacks because it was on a semi-popular multiblog site and lots of people from all over the spectrum followed it. Some of the comments were actually pretty hilarious in their idiocy. Maybe I’m just too old and grouchy now to feel like putting up with it. But even if I don’t bother to post again, I won’t delete this blog this time. Just leave it here to fossilize.

Posted in Uncategorized | 30 Comments

Why Black People Can’t Be Racist

The principle, which race racketeers sometimes explicitly state, that “only white people can be racist” has been attacked more than once in the race realist blogosphere, but I haven’t ever seen anything about the source of the idea, until today. Turns out it’s not just one of those idiot things such people randomly say to defend indefensible positions, it has a full concept behind it. Which was explicated in a socialist blog.

Why “Racism = Prejudice + Power” Is The Wrong Way to Approach the Problems of Racism

Turns out this equation is quite popular among academics, and it originated in a 1970 book by Pat Bidol. At that time, black people had very little political power, so by the equation above, it was impossible for black people to be racist since they had no (well, little) power. They could be prejudiced, but not racist. A silly semantic game, but we all know how much can be made out of such semantics. It’s being used nowadays, by people who have probably never even seen the equation let alone its origins, to defend anti-white racist policies.

This was a useful piece of information, so I read several pages of this blog. The blogger, while a socialist, is unusually intelligent for a leftist. That just means that he does a better job than most of defending his insane ideas. In the article I’ve linked, he claims that working class whites and blacks are “natural allies”. He claims that the federal deficit is not a problem, a view Democrat politicians have certainly taken to heart, and that it will only be those horrible rich people who pay it off, not the lower and middle class, honest this time we mean it, keep voting Democrat mwahaha. He has the typical left-wing masochistic love of Islam, through which brown people shall lead us whiteys to new levels of enlightenment.

I stopped when he described people who oppose the murder of unborn babies as “fascists”. Of all the ways to defend baby-killing, lumping the protectors of said babies in with mass murderers who often forced the “racially unfit” to have abortions has to make the least sense.

But at least I acquired the above useful piece of information.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

An excellent post about antisemitism

Answering Anti-Semites

More importantly, one can observe that America (and indeed the entire West) has been steadily moving to the Left since long before the Jews had significant influence. For example, the emancipation of black slaves in the 1860s followed by the original civil rights legislation; giving girls the right to vote which culminated in 1920 but was the result of a large movement for many years earlier; and so on.

The anti-Semites would have us believe that whatever process was moving the West to the left magically stopped in 1950 and after that it was the Jews. Of course this goes against common sense and Occam’s Razor, which says that it’s been the same process the whole time.

Thank you, Fortaleza84!

Posted in Jews | 2 Comments

Project Repost Completed

All right, it looks like I have now reposted all, or at least most, of the posts from my old blog. So if I continue, it’ll be new content from here on out.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

White Flight

I’ve white-flighted three times in my life. I had this wonderful house,
beautiful and charming, in a mixed neighborhood. Then the racial mix
tipped, as it always does; once a certain percentage of residents of a
neighborhood are nonwhite, all the white people flee. Also, the black
children became black preteens, old enough to make trouble. My
housemate’s car was keyed. My cat was shot with a BB gun. (She was
fine.) They played in the middle of the street and wouldn’t move so
that I could get to my driveway. They screamed “White people!” at us
when we drove by. It was like what Enoch Powell described.

I wasn’t a race realist then, but I was a plain realist, so I moved.
I didn’t look at racial demographics, just found an apartment complex
in my price range that seemed nice. Almost everybody there was white,
but I didn’t consciously notice that.

A few years later, my job took me to another state. I was short of
funds, so I got an apartment in the cheapest complex that was near my
work that I could find. Almost everybody else was Mexican or black. The
leasing office (staffed with Mexicans) treated all the residents like
dirt, knowing that most of them were poor and many were probably in the
country illegally and they had to just take it. When I refused to put
up with it, they were amazed. I moved to a more expensive complex. I
still wasn’t a race realist.

Yet again, work required me to move. I moved. I found a nice
apartment complex with a racial mix. I lived there for two years and
loved it. Then the ethnic balance changed, we honkeys became a
minority, and suddenly I started seeing suspicious people making
transactions in the parking lot late at night. There was also the loud
music and the kids who lived below me setting fires.

It so happened that just around that time, the stuff I was reading
(mostly in my blogroll) was finally forcing me to admit that no, race
wasn’t just skin deep. I really didn’t want to believe it. I resisted
it for a long time. When I finally acknowledged the truth, I went
around in shock for about a month. It wasn’t pleasant.

Then the black children in the apartment under mine started setting
fires, and I packed up. Most of the other white people had already fled.

This time, for the first time in my life, I considered race while I
was looking for a new home. I consulted maps of my city (a large city
in the Northeast, I think that’s all you need to know) that showed
crime rates and maps that showed ethnic mixes. Guess what? The more
nonwhite people, the more crime!

In my research, I came across several articles about how one of the
nearby counties was majority white. They made it sound like a nightmare
of Nazism and the oppression of women. That’s where I live now. Most of
my neighbors are white. There’s no loud music, no fires except when the
neighbors have a cookout, no drug deals going down. My car has never
been vandalized.

While I was looking at the houses in this neighborhood, I looked at
one that was nice, but needed a lot of repair. It had been vandalized
and there was graffiti all over the inside, etc. There were empty
liquor bottles in the back yard. I talked to a neighbor about it and he
said, “The people who lived here were Mexicans.” The house I ended up
taking had had thousands of dollars of repair work done since the last
people were evicted. For the first two months I was here, I got lots of
letters and phone calls to the previous occupants about unpaid bills.
Also, my next door neighbors on both sides were really nice to me once
they saw me and knew that a middle-class white person was moving in. I
heard a lot of stories about my predecessors’ loud parties, drinking,
litter, and vicious dogs. Finally, one day the previous residents
stopped by to ask if I’d received any mail for them. A white man and a
black woman, both of them scuzzy in the extreme.

Americans have become nomads because we keep having to move to get
away from the nonwhite people who are inflicted on us everywhere we go.
It’s as simple as that. It’s a huge waste of money.

And by the way, Thomas Sowell pointed out that we can’t blame this
on “conservatives”, who everybody knows are racist. (Note: sarcasm.) He
pointed out that white liberals are not buying the houses that white
conservatives flee from.

Here’s a few of the articles I came across when I was deciding to move, plus a few about the mortgage crisis:

Yes, the Community Reinvestment Act Really Did Help Cause the Housing Crisis

Plan to Insure Home Value Brings Chicago Racial Rift

Unique Chicago Program Eases Neighborhood Racial Tensions

When racial minorities started buying homes on Chicago’s
Southwest Side, residents of the formerly white enclave feared home
values would plunge. That prospect only worsened racial tensions.

Then the white residents created the Home Equity Assurance Program,
which allayed residents’ fears and created a model of how integration
should be carried out.

Note: both the previous articles are about the exact same program.

How Much Will You Pay To Live Near People Like You?

Using restricted-access Census data, a new study
examines a quarter-million households on a block-by-block basis to
yield new results about the correlation between household attributes
and school quality. The researchers find that, conditional on income,
households prefer to self-segregate on the basis of both race and

What is White Flight?

Here is one of the sites I
used for demographic information when I was looking for my new home. I
also used wikipedia and a lot of local government-run sites. They made
it challenging, but I did find out what I wanted to know: where the
white people were.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments


Stupidity should be cured, says DNA discoverer


“If you are really stupid, I would call that a disease,”
says Watson, now president of the Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, New
York. “The lower 10 per cent who really have difficulty, even in
elementary school, what’s the cause of it? A lot of people would like
to say, ‘Well, poverty, things like that.’ It probably isn’t. So I’d
like to get rid of that, to help the lower 10 per cent.”

Watson, no stranger to controversy, also suggests that genes
influencing beauty could also be engineered. “People say it would be
terrible if we made all girls pretty. I think it would be great.”

Geneticist Steve Jones, at University College London,
dismisses Watson’s comments about beauty as “daft”. “The concept of
beauty is a subjective one,” he told New Scientist.

Oh, please. If he’s a geneticist, he can’t really believe that. He’s only saying that to keep out of trouble.

Watson Was That Again? Still more on race and I.Q. By John Derbyshire

The truth content of the argument? Oh, that just gets
lost in the shouting. Who cares about truth when careers and money and
within-group status are at stake? Not many, I’m afraid; and most of
those who do care are quirky loner types that nobody much likes anyway.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Crime and Race

The Diversity Recession by Steve Sailer
Diversity is Strength!—and a Massive Housing Crisis

A couple of crime-related links:

The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States by Lawrence Auster

Like Ahab’s search for the Great White Whale, liberals’
search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending.
When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley’s and Al Sharpton’s then year-old
spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven
Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had
abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false,
the Nation said it didn’t matter, since the charges expressed the
essential nature of white men’s treatment of black women in this
country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of
raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the
accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana
Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the
true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.

Speaking of Auster, he’s mentioned in this hard-to-find article by Pat Buchanan.

And you can do your own exploration of race and crime at the Bureau of Justice.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment